Dega Central Highlands Organization Dega Central Highlands Organization
Knowledgebase

How many Dega there are

Nobody knows exactly. The published figures disagree with one another by a factor of six, and the disagreement is itself part of the story. What is not in dispute is the direction of travel: there are far fewer of us than there were, in a homeland now holding many times the people it did, and we are a minority in every province of our own country.

A large gathering of Dega people
A gathering of Dega people. DCHO archive.

The figures, and who gives them

FigureSource and dateWhat it counts
3 to 3.5 millionDega records of the French colonial periodThe whole highland population before the wars
about 1 millionGerald C. Hickey, Sons of the Mountains / Free in the Forest (1982)The highland population as he found it, with over 200,000 dead in the war and 85 per cent of villages destroyed or abandoned
about 1 million, roughly a quarter of 4 millionHuman Rights Watch, Repression of Montagnards (2002), p.13Indigenous highlanders as a share of the Central Highlands population at the time of the 2001 protests
1.5 to 1.7 millionVietnamese census returns, 2019, summing the recognised highland groupsEveryone the state counts under the relevant ethnic categories, wherever they live
around 500,000Dega community estimatePeople who are Dega in the sense this library uses — in the highlands, identifying as such

The 2019 census, group by group

These are the state's own figures. We reproduce them because they are the only systematic count that exists, not because we accept the categories they use.

PeopleVietnamese name2019 censusChiefly in
JaraiGia Rai513,930Gia Lai, Kon Tum, Dak Lak
RhadeÊ Đê398,671Dak Lak
BahnarBa Na286,910Gia Lai, Kon Tum
SedangXơ ĐăngKon Tum
KohoCơ HoLam Dong
MnongM'nôngDak Nong, Dak Lak

A further 26,922 Jarai were counted in Cambodia, where the Jarai are about 23 per cent of the population of Ratanakiri. Around 10,000 Bahnar live in the United States and some 5,000 in France. Where a cell reads — we have not yet verified the 2019 figure against the published census tables and will not print a number we cannot source.

Why no one can simply count

Three obstacles stand between anyone and an honest number.

The highlands were closed. For eighteen years after 1975 the Central Highlands were shut to almost all outside visitors, and the few admitted travelled escorted. The region reopened in the spring of 1993 — shortly before the eleventh session of the United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations, a coincidence that was noticed at the time. Visitors who tested the new openness found signs in Vietnamese and English prohibiting entry to particular districts. Access has narrowed again since 2001, and closed almost entirely after 2004.

The counter is an interested party. A census conducted by the government accused of the harm cannot by itself settle the question of the harm. That is not an accusation of falsification; it is a statement about what evidence can and cannot do. Equally, an estimate made by a diaspora organisation from outside the country, however well informed, is an estimate.

The categories are not ours. Vietnam has recognised fifty-four ethnic groups since 2 March 1979. That list merges some communities that consider themselves distinct and separates others that do not, and it has no cell for "Dega". Adding the highland rows together produces a number for something, but not quite for the thing we are describing.

On the colonial-era figure

We hold that the 3 to 3.5 million of the colonial records is closer to the truth and that Hickey was counting a population already reduced by half a century of war, forced relocation and disease. Hickey's work remains the most careful outside study of our people that exists, and this library cites it throughout, including where we think his baseline is low. A reader should know that both numbers are on the record, know who produced each, and decide.

The other half of the arithmetic

A population share has a denominator, and ours changed faster than our numbers did.

In 1899, when the French created the autonomous administration at Darlac, there was effectively no settled Vietnamese population in our territories; the first arrived from 1918 as servants and staff of French officials. From 1956 the Republic of Vietnam under Ngo Dinh Diem established land development centres across the highlands and moved Vietnamese settlers into them, including refugees resettled from the north — Dega records put the total moved into the highlands under that programme at around 850,000, a figure we give as ours because we have not been able to match it to a published government series.

After 1975 the New Economic Zones programme moved people on a scale that dwarfed anything before it: over a million northerners went south and to the central regions between 1975 and 1980, and somewhere between 750,000 and more than a million southerners were displaced into what the planners called uninhabited mountainous forested areas. Human Rights Watch concluded that state resettlement schemes had quadrupled the population density of Vietnamese and other migrants in parts of the highlands since 1975. The coffee boom of the 1990s then drew spontaneous migration on top of the planned kind.

The result, as of the 2022 estimates, is a Central Highlands region of roughly 6.09 million people in 54,548 square kilometres. We are a fraction of that. Within a single lifetime we went from being the population of the Central Highlands to being a minority in it — which is precisely what the official word for us, ethnic minority, records without saying.

Terms

Ethnic minority dân tộc thiểu số
The state's classification of us. It describes the outcome of the resettlement programmes, not a fact about who the highlands belong to.
New Economic Zones vùng kinh tế mới
The post-1975 resettlement programme that moved lowland populations into the highlands and other frontier regions.
Land development centres dinh điền
The Diem-era equivalent, from 1956.

Sources

Compiled September 2026. The blank cells above are deliberate. If you have the published 2019 census tables for the Sedang, Koho and Mnong, send them and we will fill them in with the citation.

Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

Dega culture A village, the land around it held in common, kinship that decides obligation, and a moral order older than any state that has claimed us. Around thirty peoples, each with its own building, weaving, music and dance, held together by an animist thread that runs through all of them — and by a gong tradition UNESCO has recognised as a masterpiece o... Spotlight 23 views Read More The country itself A plateau country of red basalt soil, forest and river valleys, between 500 and 1,500 metres above the sea, some 54,548 square kilometres of it. Its boundaries were drawn on 27 May 1946 by the colonial power itself — and the drawing left out the coast we had already been driven from. Reference 18 views Read More The tribes and their languages Around thirty tribes, in two language families that are not related to one another. The Chamic-speaking peoples — Jarai, Rhade, Raglai, Chu Ru — are Austronesian, cousins of the Cham of the coast and, further out, of Malay and Indonesian. The rest speak Bahnaric languages of the Mon-Khmer family, related to Khmer. Below: who is who, where, how m... Glossary 6 views Read More Dega women, and a record written about men Among the Rhade and the Jarai, land, livestock and the heirloom jars pass through women. Yet almost every source this library is built from is about men — because soldiers, prisoners and petitioners are who got written down. This page sets out what we can establish, and is explicit about the shape of what is missing. Explainer 5 views Read More

Powered by WBAMS