Dega Central Highlands Organization Dega Central Highlands Organization
Knowledgebase

What Washington has said

The United States recruited, armed and paid tens of thousands of Dega soldiers, and since 1986 has given many of their families a home. Congress has returned to the subject again and again: in hearings, in resolutions, and in reports by its own researchers. This page lists the record, so that anyone writing to their representative can cite what Congress has already said.

A flag carried at a gathering
Montagnard veterans and their families have lobbied Congress since the 1980s. Illustration.

Congress

DateDocumentWhat it says
10 Mar 1998Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, The Plight of the MontagnardsTestimony on postwar persecution and on what the United States owes its former allies.
28 Jun 2001H.Con.Res. 178 (107th Congress)After the February 2001 protests: tanks and helicopter gunships used against demonstrators; about 250 refugees under UN protection in Cambodia; a report that Vietnamese security forces paid for the return of refugees.
6 Apr 2006H.Con.Res. 320 (109th Congress), passed by the HouseRestricted access to the Central Highlands and “well-founded concerns” about Montagnards forcibly returned from Cambodia; calls for UNHCR monitoring.
26 Mar 2014Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearingStatement by Rong Nay of the Montagnard Human Rights Organization: some 500,000 Montagnard Christians, more than 300 prisoners, and more than 200 people fled to Thailand.
1 Dec 2014S.Res. 592 (113th Congress), Sen. BurrRecords that some 61,000 Montagnards fought alongside US forces, 43,000 of them in the CIDG, and condemns restrictions on religion, movement, land and property.
7 Jun 2018House Foreign Affairs subcommittee hearing, A Bad Year for Human Rights in VietnamTestimony including forced renunciations of faith by Montagnard Christians.
11 Jun 2019H.Res. 435 (116th Congress)“Up to 300 Montagnards” fled to Cambodia after October 2014 and only thirteen were recognized as refugees; urges that Vietnam be designated a Country of Particular Concern.
4 Oct 2023S.Res. 395 (118th Congress), Sens. Tillis and BuddRestates the 61,000 and 43,000 figures, notes that North Carolina has the largest Montagnard community outside Vietnam, and condemns continuing abuses.

Congress’s researchers

The Congressional Research Service has covered the Montagnards in its reports on US–Vietnam relations. In 2003 it called the February 2001 protests “the largest-scale social unrest in years” and recorded the US agreement to resettle more than 900 people from the Cambodian camps. In 2011 it estimated about a million Montagnards, many of them evangelical Protestants, and linked their loss of land to coffee and rubber.

The executive branch

  • State Department — publishes the annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices and the International Religious Freedom Report, both of which have Central Highlands sections. It designated Vietnam a Country of Particular Concern for religious freedom in September 2004, partly for the treatment of ethnic minority Protestants, and removed the designation in November 2006. In recent years it has placed Vietnam on its Special Watch List instead.
  • US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) — an independent federal commission that has repeatedly recommended that Vietnam be designated a Country of Particular Concern, and whose reports record forced renunciations and the arrests of Montagnard Protestants, most recently in its December 2025 Vietnam update.

Writing to your representative

If you live in the United States, the most useful thing you can do is write to your own Senators and Representative, citing the specific resolution above that is closest to your concern, and asking what they are doing about it. North Carolina’s delegation has the longest record on this; every state’s delegation has a vote.

Sources

Compiled September 2026. Some of the resolutions above were introduced and never voted on; they are listed because they record what members of Congress were told and what they chose to put their names to.

Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

Indigenous rights at the United Nations, and why the word matters There are two bodies of international law available to a people in our position. One protects minorities. The other protects indigenous peoples, and it is far stronger: it deals in land, consent and institutions rather than in tolerance. Which one applies to the Dega turns on a single contested word, and that is why the word is fought over so hard. Reference 39 views Read More What Vietnam signed, and what happens in the highlands Vietnam has ratified the major human rights instruments and sits as a member of the United Nations. The obligations are not disputed and they are not optional. Set against them is the record in the Central Highlands, documented by UN bodies and independent organizations. This page puts the two columns side by side. Comparison 46 views Read More What the Dega ask for Three aims, stated in 1964 and never withdrawn, pursued since 1992 by peaceful means only. Beneath them, the rights the United Nations has set out for indigenous peoples — every one of which has been taken from us — and, at the end, the four things that could be done next week by a government that wanted to. Policy 31 views Read More What the United Nations has said The Dega have been named in United Nations documents for more than thirty years — in our own submissions, in the findings of treaty bodies that examine Vietnam, and in letters from independent experts to the Vietnamese government. This page is a register of the ones we can link to, in order, with what each actually said. Reference 16 views Read More Land law and customary land In Vietnam no one owns land: it belongs to “the entire people,” and the state manages it. What families hold are rights to use it, recorded in certificates called red books. For highland villages, whose land was held by clans and lineages, rested in fallow for years and was defined by custom rather than surveys, this system has been the legal me... Explainer 19 views Read More Reports and documents The human rights record of the Dega since 1975 is written mainly in reports: by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, by governments, by the United Nations, and by Dega organizations themselves. This page lists the ones we rely on, in order, with a line on what each contains. Most are free to read. Reference 23 views Read More

Powered by WBAMS