Dega Central Highlands Organization Dega Central Highlands Organization
Knowledgebase

What the United Nations has said

The case in law Reference 58 views 16 min read Back

Our people have been named in United Nations documents for more than thirty years: in our own submissions, in the findings of the treaty bodies that examine Vietnam, in the reports of experts who visited, in letters from independent experts to the governments of Vietnam and Thailand, and in the Secretary-General’s reports on reprisals. This page is a register of those we can point to, in order, with what each actually says. The words have grown more precise over the years. The answer Vietnam gives has not changed.

A large assembly hall with wood-paneled walls, the UN emblem above the podium and blue rows of seats
The Assembly Hall of the Palais des Nations, Geneva. Vietnam answers to the treaty bodies every few years; the special procedures can write to it at any time. Photograph by Torbjorn Toby Jorgensen, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0.

How the UN machinery works, briefly

Treaty bodies are committees of independent experts that examine each state that has ratified a treaty, every few years, and publish concluding observations. The two that matter most for us are the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and the Human Rights Committee, which oversees the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the committees on economic, social and cultural rights, on children and on women have also examined Vietnam. Special procedures, the special rapporteurs, independent experts and working groups, can write to a government about particular cases at any time, and can visit a country if it invites them; their letters are published after sixty days, with any reply. The Universal Periodic Review is an examination of every state by the others, every four or five years. Each year the Secretary-General reports to the Human Rights Council on reprisals against people who cooperate with the UN. The legal background is on Indigenous rights at the UN and What Vietnam has signed.

A man in a white shirt and tie stands in front of a wall marked Nations Unies, United Nations
Our delegate at the gates of the United Nations in Geneva, 2010. DCHO archive.

The record

1993 to 2011

  • July 1993 — We submit Human Rights Violations: The People of the Dega Republic to the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations in Geneva, the first Dega document placed before the UN in our own name. The Working Group’s report of the session, attended by more than six hundred people from indigenous organizations, lists a Montagnard organization among those represented.
  • 1998 — The Special Rapporteur on religious intolerance, Abdelfattah Amor, visits Vietnam.
  • August 15, 2001 — Six months after the highland protests of February 2001, CERD’s findings on Vietnam do not mention them. They do ask about the reported forced sterilization of mountain minority women, about religious discrimination against minorities, and about the alleged transfer of population into territories inhabited by indigenous groups.
  • July 19, 2002 — The Human Rights Committee becomes the first treaty body to name us. It is concerned at the abundance of information about the treatment of the Degar (Montagnard), indicating serious violations of the ban on torture and ill-treatment and of minority rights, and at the lack of information about indigenous peoples. It asks that non-governmental organizations and other monitors be let into the Central Highlands, and puts the point on its list for follow-up within a year.
  • August 21, 2007 — The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Rodolfo Stavenhagen, tells the General Assembly that the Degar (Montagnard) and Hmong peoples still suffer repression for their part in the Cold War, that some survive by hiding in the forest, and that those who escape to Cambodia or Thailand are sometimes detained or returned.
  • July 5–15, 2010 — The Independent Expert on minority issues, Gay McDougall, visits Vietnam, including the Central Highlands. Her report of January 2011 finds the extreme poverty rate among ethnic minorities nine times that of the majority, and records that she was largely confined to meetings arranged by the government.
A portrait of a woman with short locks, glasses pushed up and a beaded necklace
Gay McDougall, the UN Independent Expert on minority issues, who went to the Central Highlands in July 2010 and found herself largely confined to meetings the government had arranged. Still from the video “Values of racial equality and non-discrimination” (2018), UN Human Rights, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0.

2012 to 2019

  • March 6, 2012 — CERD notes Vietnam’s reluctance to discuss recognizing indigenous peoples and asks it to respect the self-identification of the Khmer Krom and the Degar (Montagnard) and to consider ratifying ILO Convention 169. It is concerned at the confiscation of ancestral lands without consent or compensation; at discrimination against Christians among the Khmer Krom, the Degar and the Hmong through registration, surveillance and imprisonment, and at the 2004 Ordinance on Belief and Religion; and at the forced return of indigenous asylum seekers with the help of neighboring governments, and the crime of fleeing abroad. It asks for a report on land and recognition within a year.
  • August 2012 — The Committee on the Rights of the Child finds birth registration lowest in the North West and the Central Highlands, and tells Vietnam to end all efforts to assimilate ethnic minorities into the Kinh majority.
  • July 21–31, 2014 — The Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, visits Vietnam. His visits to An Giang, Gia Lai and Kon Tum are cut short from July 28 to 30, and people he wanted to meet are watched, warned, intimidated, harassed or stopped from traveling by the police. His report of January 2015 records the harsh persecution of followers of “Montagnard” churches such as the Ede: hundreds of churches closed, pastors imprisoned, thousands fled or in hiding after protests for land and religious freedom.
  • November 28, 2014 — The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is concerned that Vietnam does not recognize indigenous peoples, calls self-identification a fundamental principle, asks Vietnam to ratify ILO 169, and criticizes sedentarization, land revocation and a policy of phasing out ethnic minority customs the state considers obsolete.
  • August 31, 2018 — Four special rapporteurs, among them the rapporteur on minority issues, write to Vietnam about Christians of Ea Bhôk and Ea Drông communes in Dak Lak, among them Y Pum Bya, arrested and made to sign pledges to leave their church or stop worshiping together, and ask Vietnam to explain what appears to be an organized campaign.
  • January 22, 2019 — At the Universal Periodic Review, Peru asks Vietnam to open vocational training and finance to minority women, “particularly the Jarai people” and the Khmer Krom. Vietnam does not accept it.
  • March 25, 2019 — The Human Rights Committee is concerned that Vietnam does not recognize its indigenous peoples, that they are not consulted when their traditional and ancestral lands are taken for projects, and that believers are forced to renounce their faith and assaulted, sometimes fatally. In the dialogue its members ask about police sent to stop Montagnards seeking asylum in Cambodia and Thailand.
A man with glasses and a dark jacket speaks at a reception, holding a glass
Heiner Bielefeldt, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, in 2011. When he tried to reach Gia Lai and Kon Tum in July 2014, his visit was cut short and the people he meant to meet were watched and warned. Photograph by Arnfinn Pettersen, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0; cropped.

2020 to 2023

  • April 30, 2020 — Two rapporteurs write about religious leaders questioned after a conference abroad. Nay Y Ni was interrogated on his return in November 2019, his room was searched, and he lost his job at a hospital in Bình Dương.
  • November 22, 2021 — Eight mandates, including the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, write about thirty-nine human rights defenders, among them our prisoners Y Yich (twelve years, his health seriously deteriorated and treatment reportedly refused), Rah Lan Hip (seven years, for sharing articles on Dega Protestantism on Facebook), Ksor Ruk (ten years), Rmah Hlach (twelve years) and Y Ngun Knul (eighteen years, released February 28, 2020, in critical health).
  • February 2022 — The Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor, expresses utmost concern at the long detention of defenders in Vietnam, repeating those cases.
  • September 6, 2022 — Four mandates, including the Special Rapporteur on minority issues, write about Y Čung Niê, Y Thinh Niê and Y Don Niê, Montagnard Protestants who asked their communes how their groups could register, were arrested and questioned without a lawyer, and were each fined four million dong for marking the UN day for victims of religious violence.
  • April 28, 2023 — Four mandates write about Y Khiu Niê and Y Sĩ Êban, stopped at Tân Sơn Nhất airport on November 6, 2022, on their way to a religious freedom conference in Bali. Y Khiu Niê was held and questioned for more than a day and made to sign a promise to stop reporting to the UN; Y Sĩ Êban was beaten about the face and head and made to promise to leave his church. Vietnam did not reply in time, and the letter was published in June.
  • November 29–30, 2023 — In its dialogue with Vietnam, CERD raises the arrest and prosecution of a hundred Montagnards after the Dak Lak attacks of June 2023 and some 20,000 stateless households in the Central Highlands. A member asks whether Vietnam will accept that indigenous peoples exist on its territory and whether it will ratify ILO 169. The delegation says it speaks of minority people, not indigenous peoples, for historical reasons, and gives no answer on ILO 169.
  • December 27, 2023 — CERD’s findings name the Montagnards among the Indigenous Peoples whose recognition Vietnam refuses to discuss, and note that land can be taken on fifteen days’ notice with no free, prior and informed consent. They record reports of racial profiling, torture, deaths in custody and excessive force during the investigation of the Dak Lak attacks, the conviction of eighty-one Montagnards on a terrorism charge, attacks by so-called Red Flag Associations that the government described as patriots, and reprisals against Y Khiu Niê and Y Sĩ Êban for trying to cooperate with the UN.

2024 to 2026

  • May 7, 2024 — At the Universal Periodic Review, Vietnam does not accept Mexico’s recommendation to recognize Indigenous Peoples by self-identification and ratify ILO 169, Malta’s to end reprisals against people who cooperate with the UN, or the United States’ to end forced renunciations of faith. No state mentions the Dak Lak trial.
  • June 14, 2024 — Thirteen mandates, among them the Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, write to Vietnam and to Thailand. The letter to Vietnam describes villagers urged by state media to hunt down suspects, arming themselves with knives, machetes and sticks, and the death of Y Bŭm Byă, found hanging near his home after a police summons, his body badly beaten. It judges the treatment of the Montagnards inconsistent with Vietnam’s obligations toward indigenous peoples under customary international law, as the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples reflects. The letter to Thailand warns against returning Y Quynh Buondap.
  • July 4, 2024 — Thirteen experts publicly urge Thailand to refuse his extradition. See Y Quynh Buondap.
  • August 12, 2024 — The Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Ben Saul, files a brief as friend of the court with the Bangkok Criminal Court on terrorism charges and the absolute ban on returning anyone to torture, the first intervention we know of by a UN expert in a court case about one of our defenders.
  • August 20, 2024 — The Secretary-General’s report on reprisals records developments in the cases of Y Khiu Niê and Y Sĩ Êban.
  • August 28, 2024 — Fourteen UN experts, among them the Special Rapporteurs on counter-terrorism, on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, on minority issues and on human rights defenders, condemn the misuse of counter-terrorism law against Montagnard Indigenous Peoples: vigilantes from the majority group incited against them, torture and forced confessions, the mass trial by a mobile court in January 2024, the death in custody of Y Bŭm Byă after torture, and the listing of an overseas Montagnard group as a terrorist organization. They call it part of a larger and intensifying pattern of historical discrimination against the Montagnards.
  • October 16, 2024 — After the Bangkok court rules on September 30 that Y Quynh Buondap can be extradited, twelve experts point out that Thailand has no extradition treaty with Vietnam and can refuse.
  • July 2025 — The Human Rights Committee’s fourth review of Vietnam. Its members name persistent discrimination against the Khmer Krom and the Montagnards, and Vietnam again rejects the word indigenous. The findings of July 18 remain concerned that Vietnam does not recognize the Indigenous Peoples in its territory, note the forced post-prison education of Montagnard prisoners, tell Vietnam not to use national security and counter-terrorism laws against religious minorities such as the Montagnard Protestants, and raise enforced disappearances and transnational repression.
  • July 24, 2025 — In two of six joint letters on transnational repression in the Mekong region, ten mandates write to Vietnam and twelve to Thailand about Y Quynh Buondap and the 2024 trial, in which ninety-nine of the hundred defendants were Montagnards. The letters record that sixty-five Montagnards, five of them recognized refugees, were detained in Bang Yai on February 23, 2025, that forty-three were sentenced two days later, and that bail was refused to three refugees, Y Phuong Enuol, Y Duong Bkrong and H Leo Nie, because Vietnam had warrants for them.
  • August 22, 2025 — Twelve mandates write to the Secretary-General of ASEAN that Vietnam may be sharing information with Thailand to identify Montagnard refugees for forced return.
  • September 17, 2025 — The Secretary-General’s report on reprisals describes the mass trial of a hundred people, mostly Indigenous Montagnards, and Thailand’s cooperation in efforts to return Vietnamese Montagnards.
  • December 3, 2025 — Experts say that the extradition of Y Quynh Buondap on November 28 violated the ban on returning people to danger, and that his whereabouts are unknown.
  • February 3 and 23, 2026 — In its review of Vietnam, the women’s committee hears that Montagnard, Hmong and Khmer Krom Christian mothers are refused birth certificates for their children to make them renounce their faith. Its findings speak of rural, Indigenous and ethnic minority women.
A large round conference chamber with curved rows of desks under a sculpted, brightly colored ceiling
The Human Rights and Alliance of Civilizations Room at the Palais des Nations, where the Human Rights Council sits and receives the Secretary-General’s reports on reprisals. Photograph by Ludovic Courtès, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.

What the record adds up to

Read in order, the documents say the same three things more and more precisely: that we are a distinct people whose own name should be used; that our land has been taken without consent; and that the law is being used against our religion and our advocates. The vocabulary has moved with them. In 2002 and 2012 the committees wrote of the Degar (Montagnard); from 2023 the treaty bodies, the special procedures and the Secretary-General write of Montagnard Indigenous Peoples. What the record also shows is that Vietnam’s answer has not changed in thirty years. It does not accept that it has indigenous peoples, and it does not accept the premise of the questions.

The record also has silences. No treaty body finding and no Universal Periodic Review recommendation names the uprisings of 2001 or 2004. The committees wrote around them. No state named the Dak Lak trial at the review four months after it.

A long nineteenth-century building with a mansard roof beside a lawn
The Palais Wilson in Geneva, seat of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, from which the special procedures’ letters to Vietnam and Thailand are sent. Photograph by Nick-D, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Using these documents

UN findings are not court judgments, but they carry weight with asylum tribunals, foreign ministries and journalists. If you are preparing an asylum claim or a submission, cite the specific document and paragraph, not this page. Where we have read a document only as others quote it, we say so in the sources.

What we do not know. What Gay McDougall wrote about the Central Highlands in her 2011 report; we have not been able to read those paragraphs. What the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found in 1994 and Abdelfattah Amor in 1998. The paragraph numbers of CERD’s findings of December 2023, which we know from quotations. Whether the special rapporteurs wrote to Vietnam about Easter 2004. What has happened to Y Quynh Buondap since his return. Whether any UN body has named our people in 2026 beyond the women’s committee.

Sources

Compiled September 2026. The UN’s own search tools, the special procedures communications database and the treaty body database, will find anything newer than this page.

united nationscerdhuman rights committeespecial rapporteurspecial proceduresuprilo 169indigenousdegarcommunicationstreaty bodies19932012201420232025
Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

Indigenous rights at the United Nations, and why the word matters International law offers a people in our position two bodies of rights. One protects minorities. The other protects indigenous peoples, and it goes much further: it deals in land, consent and a people’s own institutions, not only in tolerance. Which one applies to the Dega turns on a single contested word. Vietnam says it has no indigenous peopl... Reference 76 views Read More What Vietnam signed, and what happens in the highlands Vietnam has ratified the major human rights treaties, voted for the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and has sat as a member of the United Nations since 1977. The obligations are not disputed and they are not optional. Set against them is the record in the Central Highlands, documented by the United Nations’ own bodies. This page... Comparison 86 views Read More What the Dega ask for Three aims, rooted in FULRO’s first declarations of 1964 and 1965 and set down in this form before the United Nations in 1993, pursued since October 1992 by peaceful means only. Beneath them, the rights the world now recognizes for indigenous peoples, every one of which has been taken from us; and at the end, four things a government that wanted... Policy 73 views Read More What Washington has said The United States recruited, armed and paid tens of thousands of our men, and since 1986 has given many of their families a home. Congress has come back to us again and again, in hearings, in resolutions and in the reports of its own researchers, and the executive branch has twice treated Vietnam’s religious persecution as a matter of policy. Th... Reference 37 views Read More Land law and customary land In Vietnam nobody owns land. The land belongs to the entire people, the State represents the people, and what a family holds is a right to use, written on a certificate with red covers. That arrangement did not have to be aimed at us to take our country from us. A registry that records the field a family is cropping this season, in one household... Reference 63 views Read More Vietnam and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples On September 13, 2007, Vietnam voted for the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and said nothing. Twenty-nine states explained their votes that day. Vietnam was not among them; it appears in the record of that meeting exactly once, in the list of the 143 in favor. In the years since it has told four separate UN mechanisms that the D... Explainer 45 views Read More

Powered by WBAMS