Dega Central Highlands Organization Dega Central Highlands Organization
Knowledgebase

The camps and the prisons, 1975 to today

Since 1975 our people have been held in two generations of camps and prisons. The first held the men of the old order: our ministers and officials, the soldiers who had served with the Americans, and our pastors, taken without trial after the war. The second has held the people of the churches and the land protests since 2001, tried in groups and sentenced under the national security articles of the penal code. Some of the places are the same. The camp in Phú Yên that held our minister in the early 1980s held our pastors thirty years later. This page sets out the places we can name, the people we know were held in them, what was done there, and how much is still missing.

Map of Vietnam marking camps and prisons in the north, on the coast and in the Central Highlands
The camps and prisons that have held our people, as far as we can name them. Squares held our people after 1975 without trial; circles after 2001, after trial. Xuân Phước held both. Of the 200 people in our 2001–2006 records whose prison is known, 137 were sent to the north. Positions are approximate. Base map by Uwe Dedering, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0; markers and labels DCHO, same license.

First generation 1975 to the late 1980s: reeducation camps and prisons, without trial

Second generation 2001 to today: prisons, after trials under the national security articles

Places we can name Gia Trung (Gia Lai), Buon Ma Thuot prison, Xuân Phước A-20 (Phú Yên), Nam Hà (Hà Nam), Prison No. 5 (Thanh Hóa), An Phước (Bình Dương), Dak Trung (Dak Lak), T-20 near Pleiku

In our records 337 people arrested between 2001 and 2006; the prison is known for 200 of them, and 137 of those were sent to the north

The first generation, 1975 and after

After the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, former officers, officials, police, teachers, religious figures and anyone associated with the Republic of Vietnam or with the Americans were ordered to register in May and to report for “re-education” in June. They were told how long it would take: ordinary soldiers three days, junior officers ten, senior officials a month. In fact people were held for anything from weeks to eighteen years. The legal basis was a 1961 resolution of the North Vietnamese National Assembly, carried south after the war, which allowed three years of detention by administrative order, renewable without limit. Nobody was tried. Between two hundred thousand and three hundred thousand people from the South were held, on the conservative estimates. Higher figures circulate; scholars regard them as inflated.

Nobody has counted how many of them were ours.

Why our people were taken

Because there were lists, and our names were on them. From 1961 Dega men were recruited, armed, trained and paid by American programs: the CIDG camps, the Mike Force, the Kit Carson Scouts, the Provincial Reconnaissance Units, the Truong Son cadre. Administered programs produce rosters, pay records, unit histories and discharge papers. So do a ministry, a provincial administration and a school.

Human Rights Watch, drawing on the anthropologist Gerald Hickey, records who was taken:

“Those who had worked with U.S. Special Forces or FULRO were sent to re-education camps.”

and of the leaders:

“At the same time all of the highland leaders from the ministry and those who had been active in provincial administrations and programs were captured and incarcerated either in jails or ‘reeducation camps.’”

Rong Nay, who was one of them, told the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee on March 10, 1998: “All the Montagnard leaders and preachers have been arrested and jailed.” The years in the forest are on Re-education and the forest, 1975–1992.

It was not only the men who had fought. Paul Nưr and Nay Luett had spent 1964 to 1975 arguing our case inside the machinery of the Saigon state rather than fighting it, and neither had carried a weapon in eleven years. Both were imprisoned, and both died of it. And it reached the Dega who had chosen the other side: Y Bih Aleo and Y Ngong Nie Kdam had held office in the National Liberation Front, and some of its highland leaders kept a ceremonial position after 1975, but none of it produced autonomy, land, or schools in our languages. What was done to us after 1975 was not a punishment for having chosen wrongly in the war. See Highlanders on the other side.

The places

Portrait of a highland man in a suit
Nay Luett, Minister for the Development of Ethnic Minorities until 1975. He was held at Buon Ma Thuot prison, a plantation camp and Xuân Phước. DCHO archive.

We can name four.

Gia Trung, in what was then Gia Lai–Kon Tum province. Amnesty International, in its report on Vietnam of February 1990, records that most of a group of southern intellectuals arrested in 1976 “were sent to a camp in Gia Trung in the central highland province of Gia Lai-Kontum.” The camp was built on our land, and it is still a prison.

Buon Ma Thuot prison, where Nay Luett was first held.

A plantation camp near Buon Ma Thuot, given in one account as Mewal, and not confirmed in any other.

Xuân Phước, in Phú Yên, the camp known as A-20, where Nay Luett was held last. Amnesty lists A-20 among Vietnam’s long-term political prisons independently of any account of him.

That is the whole list we have for those years. In the same 1990 report Amnesty noted that a number of highland pastors were reported to be in detention, “but information about this latter group is scarce.” The best-known human rights organization in the world, in 1990, could not see us.

What the camps were

Survivors from all over the South describe the same things: political indoctrination and written confessions; forced labor clearing jungle, cutting timber, planting corn and cassava, digging wells and sweeping minefields without equipment; beatings for small offenses; confinement in metal conex boxes; reduced rations and solitary confinement; and deaths from hunger, malaria, beriberi, dysentery and tuberculosis. From 1980 families were allowed to visit every three months, and for many prisoners those visits were the only extra food they had. The best descriptions that exist are by Vietnamese officers. We have not found a single first-person Dega account of the inside of a camp in those years, and that silence is part of what happened.

The people we know

Nay Luett, the Jarai who had been Minister for the Development of Ethnic Minorities, went from Buon Ma Thuot prison to the plantation camp to Xuân Phước. He had tuberculosis. He was held eight, nine or ten years, depending on who tells it; he died either in captivity in February 1984 or at home in his village two months after he was let go. Paul Nưr, the Bahnar who had been minister before him, died in prison. Their lives are on Paul Nưr and Nay Luett: the ministry years.

The men who had served with the Americans were held as long. K’Sao Krajan, who had won an American Bronze Star, for four years. Y Monah, a border scout for the Green Berets, for five. Ykhiem Ayun, a Mike Force soldier captured at Pleiku, until 1992. See 1975, and what came after.

A woman’s account survives from a little later. An Ede church leader from a hamlet near Buon Ma Thuot told Human Rights Watch in April 2001 that she had been arrested in 1985 for FULRO activities and held in a dark cell for a year. When she came out she began to preach, and was arrested again, beaten at the provincial police station and put on probation.

What coming home meant

In December 2000 eight villagers of Krong Ana district in Dak Lak wrote down in Ede what had been done to our people and got the paper out of the country; Human Rights Watch obtained it in July 2001. It says the men who came back from detention lived a year or two and then died, and that our retired officials were paralyzed; the villagers believed they had been given poisoned injections. We cannot test the explanation. We can record that the people who buried them believed it, and that nobody has ever counted those deaths.

Release did not end the sentence for the families either. Land taken while a man was inside was not given back.

The second generation, 2001 to today

In February 2001, at Easter 2004 and in April 2008, our people marched in their thousands for their land and their churches. The arrests that followed were not reeducation. They were trials, often of several people at once, under the articles of the penal code on “undermining national unity,” “disrupting security” and fleeing abroad; see The laws used against us. Human Rights Watch counted more than 350 of our people sentenced between 2001 and 2011, at least 250 in prison or awaiting trial in 2011, and at least 25 who had died in prisons, jails or police lock-ups, or soon after being released early to a hospital or home. Amnesty International, in 2016:

“In 2001, 2004, and 2008, large numbers of ethnic minority Montagnards, Christians from the country’s Central Highlands, were arrested following demonstrations calling for freedom of religion and an end to confiscation of land owned by Montagnard groups.”

Where our records say they were sent

Our own prisoner records, compiled from families and congregations, name 337 of our people arrested between 2001 and 2006 in five provinces. Where the family knew where a prisoner had been sent, the record says so:

Where heldPeopleWhat it is
Hà Nam121almost certainly Nam Hà prison, in the north, more than a thousand kilometers from the highlands
Phú Yên, or Tuy Hòa44the province of Xuân Phước, the camp A-20
Thanh Hóa15the province of Prison No. 5, also in the north
Hà Tĩnh1in the north
Pleiku, including “T-20 in Pleiku area”9detention in the highlands
Binh Phuoc, Dak Nong, Dak Lak, Chu Se10provincial and district detention
not known to the family137—

Two things stand out. Of the 200 whose prison is known, 137 were sent north, to Hà Nam, Thanh Hóa and Hà Tĩnh, where their families could rarely afford to visit and where the guards did not speak their language. Amnesty International has described the practice among Vietnam’s prisoners of conscience in general:

“A central component of Viet Nam’s systematic abuse of prisoners of conscience is subjecting them to repeated prison transfers: a deliberate practice that aims to further isolate them from their families, break their spirits and punish them for engaging in prison activism.”

And the second-largest group was sent to Phú Yên, to the camp that had held Nay Luett a generation earlier.

The dead

Our people have died in the hands of the police and in the prisons. Y Ben Hdok, twenty-nine, was arrested on April 28, 2008, over that month’s protests. On May 1 the police told his family he had hanged himself. His family, who saw the body, told Human Rights Watch that his head, his ribs and a leg were broken and his teeth knocked out. The names of the dead we know are on the memorial register. Most of the twenty-five that Human Rights Watch counted between 2001 and 2011 have never been named anywhere.

Where to find a person

The 337 names are on the five province pages of our prisoner records, with how to search them. The best-documented cases are profiled on Our defenders and prisoners. If somebody has just been taken, go to If a family member is detained.

What we do not know

How many of our people were in the camps after 1975, which camps, how long, and how many came back. The figure of two hundred thousand to three hundred thousand is for the whole South. No breakdown by people exists that we have found.

The dead of both generations. There is no roll of the men who died in the camps, or of those who came home to die in the 1980s. Vietnamese-American organizations have worked since 2006 to find graves from the camps; nothing like it exists for us.

Where the 137 are whose families were never told, and the names of the twenty-five and more who have died in custody since 2001.

The generation taken in 1975 was in its twenties and thirties then, and is in its seventies and eighties now, where it is alive at all. Everything else in this library can be rebuilt from documents later. This cannot.

If you were held, or someone in your family was, please record it: the name, the year, where they were told to report, which camp or prison, what the work was, when they came out, and whether they came home. A name and a year is already more than we have. Read Reporting safely first if you are in Vietnam, and then how to document.

See also: 1975, and what came after, Re-education and the forest, 1975–1992, Prisoner records, The laws used against us, Massacres of our people.

Sources

Compiled September 2026. The counts in the table are taken from our own records as the families gave them; many entries give only the province. We are adding the names of those held, and of those who died, as families send them.

Was this answer helpful?

Related Articles

Bauxite: the plateau as a mine Under the coffee is the ore. Most of Vietnam’s bauxite lies under the Central Highlands, in the red laterite of Dak Nong and Lam Dong. In 2007 the government planned twenty-five mines and seven alumina plants there. Two plants were built, at Tan Rai and Nhan Co, and in 2026 the state and its partners were planning to double them and to add more.... Explainer 77 views Read More Cu Kuin, June 2023 — and the trial that followed At about half past midnight on Sunday, June 11, 2023, two groups of armed men attacked the commune headquarters at Ea Tieu and Ea Ktur in Cu Kuin district, Dak Lak. Nine people were killed: four police officers, two commune officials, and three civilians whose names have never been published. We do not defend that attack and nothing on this page... Explainer 109 views Read More Easter Week 2004 On the Saturday and Sunday of Easter 2004, people came out of their villages in thirty-nine communes across seventeen districts of Gia Lai, Dak Lak and Dak Nong. They came on farm tractors with trailers behind them, packed with food for five days, because they meant to stay. They were asking for four things: their land, the right to worship, the... Reference 93 views Read More How we died Hundreds of thousands of our people were killed in wars fought across our land by armies that were not ours: at least one in five of us, by the only careful count. What has happened since those wars ended is harder to count, and it is the reason we use the word genocide. This page sets out the figures we have, where each comes from and what each... Reference 99 views Read More The land, and what was planted on it Vietnam went from a marginal coffee producer to the second largest in the world in about fifteen years, on the red basalt of the Central Highlands. The story of how that happened and the story of what happened to us are the same story told from two ends. Forest cover in our highlands fell from 42.8 percent in 1990 to 19 percent in 2020, and most... Reference 103 views Read More 1975, and what came after The Republic of Vietnam began to lose the war in our country, at Buon Ma Thuot on March 10, 1975, and it lost the highlands in two weeks. For our people the spring of 1975 was not an ending. Our minister asked the Americans for protection and was refused. Two thousand of our people waited on a beach at Nha Trang for a ship that never came. Our l... Explainer 79 views Read More

Powered by WBAMS